iGaming Network
← PG Soft
Dragon Legend

PG Soft

Dragon Legend

Display brand: SK69 · Data source: SK69

Current source RTP

Good92.48%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · PG Soft

How we’d play this

Before you mash spin on a Good title

92.48% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Good looks nicer — your limits still run the show.

  1. Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
  2. If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
  3. Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
  4. Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.
  5. When you hit your win stop, leave. “One more round” is how good sessions die.

Skip this

  • Don’t go all-in just because the badge is green.
  • Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

92.48% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.

Lowest

91.44%

Average

92.29%

Highest

93.43%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 91.44%2026-10-27 04:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 92.57%2026-10-26 22:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 91.59%2026-10-26 16:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 93.43%2026-10-26 10:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 92.68%2026-10-26 04:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 93.15%2026-10-25 22:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 91.48%2026-10-25 16:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 91.72%2026-10-25 10:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 92.04%2026-10-25 04:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 92.60%2026-10-24 22:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 92.70%2026-10-24 16:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 92.12%2026-10-24 10:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://sk69ld.com/