

PG Soft
Candy Burst
Display brand: NOW32 · Data source: NOW32
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC
Share this RTP page · PG Soft
How we’d play this
What we’d actually do here
93.48% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”
Quick tip: Short blocks beat endless grinding.
- Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
- Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.
- Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
- Feeling rushed, angry, or clicking too fast? Close it for fifteen minutes. Seriously.
- When you hit your win stop, leave. “One more round” is how good sessions die.
Skip this
- Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”
- Don’t raise after two quiet spins.
Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.
In plain words
93.48% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.
Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.
Lowest
92.34%
Average
93.75%
Highest
94.61%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 94.03%2026-10-27 04:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.51%2026-10-26 22:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.68%2026-10-26 16:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.68%2026-10-26 10:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 94.08%2026-10-26 04:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 94.32%2026-10-25 22:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 94.61%2026-10-25 16:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 94.11%2026-10-25 10:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.44%2026-10-25 04:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 94.56%2026-10-24 22:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 92.34%2026-10-24 16:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 92.66%2026-10-24 10:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://now32ld.com/
