

PG Soft
Caishen Wins
Display brand: JUS22 · Data source: JUS22
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC
Share this RTP page · PG Soft
How we’d play this
Good band — keep it simple
86.62% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”
Quick tip: Same stake. Clear exits. Timer on.
- Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
- When you hit your win stop, leave. “One more round” is how good sessions die.
- If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
- Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.
- If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.
Skip this
- Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.
- Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”
Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.
In plain words
86.62% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.
Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.
Lowest
85.43%
Average
86.48%
Highest
87.68%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 87.01%2026-10-27 04:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 86.02%2026-10-26 22:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 87.13%2026-10-26 16:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 87.42%2026-10-26 10:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 85.44%2026-10-26 04:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 86.29%2026-10-25 22:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 85.73%2026-10-25 16:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 86.31%2026-10-25 10:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 85.43%2026-10-25 04:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 87.68%2026-10-24 22:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 87.18%2026-10-24 16:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 86.07%2026-10-24 10:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://jus22ld.com/
