iGaming Network
← PG Soft
Circus Delight

PG Soft

Circus Delight

Display brand: RUSH33 · Data source: RUSH33

Current source RTP

Good90.45%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · PG Soft

How we’d play this

What we’d actually do here

90.45% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Short blocks beat endless grinding.

  1. If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.
  2. Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.
  3. Had a nice hit? Mentally bank some of it. Don’t immediately try to double the table.
  4. Stay on this game for the session. Hopping every few spins usually means you’re chasing.
  5. Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.

Skip this

  • Don’t play longer to “make the Good RTP work.”
  • Don’t stack five Good games in a panic night.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

90.45% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.

Lowest

89.32%

Average

90.46%

Highest

91.48%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 90.92%2026-10-27 04:37 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.56%2026-10-26 22:37 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.20%2026-10-26 16:37 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.21%2026-10-26 10:37 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.74%2026-10-26 04:37 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 91.47%2026-10-25 22:37 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.90%2026-10-25 16:37 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.92%2026-10-25 10:37 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 91.48%2026-10-25 04:37 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.32%2026-10-24 22:37 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.05%2026-10-24 16:37 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.75%2026-10-24 10:37 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://rush33ld.com/