iGaming Network
← Pragmatic Play
Lucky Panda

Pragmatic Play

Lucky Panda

Display brand: EZ96 · Data source: EZ96

Current source RTP

Average83.76%

Last observed 2026-10-27 05:23 UTC

Share this RTP page · Pragmatic Play

How we’d play this

Mid band — expect some bumps

You’re at 83.76% — middle of the pack. Fine for a night out if you keep it light. Not a sign something big is “owed.”

Quick tip: Mid-range nights go better when they’re short.

  1. If stretching the money matters, peek at Good filter titles instead.
  2. Autoplay makes it easy to ignore the clock — turn it off if that happens to you.
  3. Three bad decisions in a row? Phone down, five-minute walk.
  4. End on the timer even if you’re “almost” at a win target.
  5. Fifteen–twenty minutes of nothing but red? Switch game or take a break.

Skip this

  • Don’t double after every loss. That spiral ends badly.
  • Don’t skip the stop-loss “just this once.”

Swings happen here. Chasing them is optional — and costly.

In plain words

83.76% — Average (70–85%). Middle ground. Every spin is still a coin flip in practice.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.

Lowest

82.63%

Average

83.62%

Highest

84.51%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 82.71%2026-10-27 05:23 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 82.99%2026-10-26 23:23 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 83.94%2026-10-26 17:23 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 84.40%2026-10-26 11:23 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 83.70%2026-10-26 05:23 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 84.41%2026-10-25 23:23 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 83.17%2026-10-25 17:23 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 84.51%2026-10-25 11:23 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 83.11%2026-10-25 05:23 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 84.01%2026-10-24 23:23 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 83.92%2026-10-24 17:23 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 82.63%2026-10-24 11:23 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://ez96ld.com/