iGaming Network
← Spadegaming
Clash of the Giants

Spadegaming

Clash of the Giants

Display brand: OG321 · Data source: OG321

Current source RTP

Good90.23%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · Spadegaming

How we’d play this

If you’re playing this one (Good RTP)

90.23% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Win a bit, leave a bit. Don’t get greedy mid-session.

  1. Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.
  2. When you hit your win stop, leave. “One more round” is how good sessions die.
  3. Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
  4. If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.
  5. Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.

Skip this

  • Don’t play longer to “make the Good RTP work.”
  • Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

90.23% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.

Lowest

89.19%

Average

89.99%

Highest

91.39%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 90.14%2026-10-27 07:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.58%2026-10-27 01:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 91.33%2026-10-26 19:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.19%2026-10-26 13:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.48%2026-10-26 07:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.53%2026-10-26 01:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.36%2026-10-25 19:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.68%2026-10-25 13:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.38%2026-10-25 07:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 91.39%2026-10-25 01:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.60%2026-10-24 19:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.23%2026-10-24 13:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://og321ld.com/