Spadegaming
Clash of the Giants
Display brand: VS96 · Data source: VS96
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC
Share this RTP page · Spadegaming
How we’d play this
Only if you’re okay walking away fast
53.97% under 70%. If you care about lasting longer, switch to Good or Average instead.
Quick tip: One short visit beats a long chase.
- Smallest comfortable stake. Ten to twenty minutes, max.
- Ignore tips that say Low is “about to explode.”
- If you’re annoyed before you start, don’t start.
- One deposit for the session. No angry top-ups.
- Set a tight loss stop and actually honor it.
Skip this
- Don’t chase the same loss across three Low games.
- Don’t turn a ten-minute plan into an hour.
Low doesn’t hide a secret jackpot clock. The game doesn’t owe you.
In plain words
53.97% — Low (under 70%). Tougher band. Keep expectations small.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
If someone sells a guaranteed sequence, they’re selling fiction. Your stop-loss is real.
The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.
Lowest
52.92%
Average
53.98%
Highest
55.02%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 54.16%2026-10-27 05:56 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 53.56%2026-10-26 23:56 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 54.64%2026-10-26 17:56 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 52.92%2026-10-26 11:56 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 53.73%2026-10-26 05:56 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 54.91%2026-10-25 23:56 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 55.02%2026-10-25 17:56 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 54.20%2026-10-25 11:56 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 53.12%2026-10-25 05:56 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 53.37%2026-10-24 23:56 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 53.17%2026-10-24 17:56 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 54.98%2026-10-24 11:56 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://vs96ld.com/