iGaming Network
← Spadegaming
Candy Pop 2

Spadegaming

Candy Pop 2

Display brand: JOM99 · Data source: JOM99

Current source RTP

Good87.98%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · Spadegaming

How we’d play this

A calmer way to sit with Good RTP

87.98% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: If you’re tilting, you’re done for now.

  1. Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
  2. If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
  3. Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
  4. When you hit your win stop, leave. “One more round” is how good sessions die.
  5. Keep bill money and play money separate. If you’re mixing them, stop.

Skip this

  • Don’t stack five Good games in a panic night.
  • Don’t raise after two quiet spins.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

87.98% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Each row is a sync snapshot — not your personal spin log.

Lowest

87.32%

Average

88.05%

Highest

89.02%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 87.32%2026-10-27 05:59 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.40%2026-10-26 23:59 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.55%2026-10-26 17:59 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.69%2026-10-26 11:59 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.66%2026-10-26 05:59 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.71%2026-10-25 23:59 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.02%2026-10-25 17:59 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.53%2026-10-25 11:59 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.36%2026-10-25 05:59 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.61%2026-10-24 23:59 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.05%2026-10-24 17:59 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.72%2026-10-24 11:59 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://jom99ld.com/