iGaming Network
← Spadegaming
Double Flame

Spadegaming

Double Flame

Display brand: JK32 · Data source: JK32

Current source RTP

Average74.46%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · Spadegaming

How we’d play this

How we’d handle Average here

You’re at 74.46% — middle of the pack. Fine for a night out if you keep it light. Not a sign something big is “owed.”

Quick tip: Tiny bets. Tight stop. Watch the clock.

  1. Only bump the stake one step after a win — never after a loss.
  2. Three bad decisions in a row? Phone down, five-minute walk.
  3. Use a tighter loss stop than you would on Good titles.
  4. Autoplay makes it easy to ignore the clock — turn it off if that happens to you.
  5. If stretching the money matters, peek at Good filter titles instead.

Skip this

  • Don’t trust chat that says “about to break.”
  • Don’t skip the stop-loss “just this once.”

Swings happen here. Chasing them is optional — and costly.

In plain words

74.46% — Average (70–85%). Middle ground. Every spin is still a coin flip in practice.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.

Lowest

73.54%

Average

74.55%

Highest

75.50%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 74.43%2026-10-27 07:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 75.13%2026-10-27 01:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 74.05%2026-10-26 19:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 74.22%2026-10-26 13:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 75.50%2026-10-26 07:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 74.86%2026-10-26 01:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 74.74%2026-10-25 19:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 73.54%2026-10-25 13:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 73.96%2026-10-25 07:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 74.45%2026-10-25 01:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 74.29%2026-10-24 19:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 75.41%2026-10-24 13:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://jk32ld.com/